éo

me revoilààààààààà! désolé pour les VIP j´en sais rien, de toute façon y reste que des cadeaux naz sur nintendo!

Wario, y faut avoir luigi! va au 1er etage et va dans la salle du miroir, prend une fleur d´invisibilité, va a gauche, traverse le miroir et saute dans le tableau de wario! et là t´as un monde glacé et au bout... un boss pour un wario!!!!!

é comen on va o 1er étage?

la salle du miroire cé le long couloire avec peach au bout??

je ne pense pas, c apres dans le jeu taura une salle avec un grand miroir

gé 50 étoile et ge voi pas ou cé

a 50 etoiles tu la voi la salle avec les miroirs c sur
comment on a luigi?

moi g 34 étoiles je l´ai la sale?

i faut allé ds le manoir de boo et au deuxieme etage a droite ia une salle avec un estrade tu monte kan t dessu si ta mario tu prend la case et tu vole un peu et plus en haut ia une salle avec le tableau de luigui

ge voi toujs ps ou é le miroire

elle é ou la salle??

Bonn ne vous etonnez pas, j´ai juste besoin du mon topic pour transferer des infos de TPE. Merci donc aux moderos de pas supprimer le topic ( sinon c´est une baffe).

3°) Battle of Azincourt

In the summer of 1415 Henry V led an army to France that landed at Harfleur. The date was August 14. The passage across the Channel was smooth and the landing unopposed. The first task was to seize the town, which was well defended but soon surrounded by the English. The English had a number of cannons with them and the town was bombarded. First the outer defenses fell and when it became evident that there would be no relief, the French asked for terms. It finally surrendered September 22. The town resisted stubbornly before it fell, costing Henry about 1/3 of the 8000 archers and 2000 mounted troops. Burne puts the number available for field operations ( after garrisoning and illness) at about 6,000.
From here Henry set out for Calais. It is possible to follow his route on the map ( from Bacquet´s Azincourt.) He followed the coast to the Somme but unlike Edward III in the march leading up to Crecy, did not cross at the mouth of the river. He paralleled the river on the south side looking for a crossing. Meanwhile, the French were organizing a force near Rouen to counter the English incursion. This was organized under Constable D´Albret and Marchal Boucicaut. Boucicaut made a quick march and placed himself on the north bank of the Somme, blocking an easy crossing for Henry. This forced Henry to go further east to look for a crossing and to endure a longer march, actually moving away from Calais. He finally crossed at Voyenne and headed towards Calais.
Near Agincourt, the French placed themselves in a position blocking the road to Calais. Henry, as was the case of his predecessors at Crecy and Poitiers, was not looking for a fight but negotiations failed. Henry was not willing to renounce his claim to the French throne, and was forced to fight. He was seriously outnumbered, as were the English at Crecy and Poitiers. His troops were also hungry and tired, being on a hard march. It was raining and both armies were wet. More significantly, so was the battlefield - wet and muddy.
On the morning of August 25 the English aligned themselves in three groups, led by York, Camoys and the king in the center. The French were also aligned in three groups, one behind the other, their pattern in earlier battles. Charles VI, king of France, was not present at this fight. The French were led by D´Albert and Boucicaut. The French restrained themselves and did not advance, so Henry had the archers advance and take the first shots.
The battlefield looks much the same today as it did to Henry V. This photo is from Henry´s perspective, looking down a slight decline to the French.
There is a woods to the right, as well as to the left. The English line was about 950 yards wide, the French line about 1200 yards. This was to turn out to be very disadvantageous to the French. After about 4 hours without action on either side, Henry ordered his line to advance. The sketch below shows the position of the English advance. The picture next to the sketch shows the road evident in the sketch and a modern marker ( line of bowmen) showing the approximate final English position. This photo is looking up hill towards the English position and shows the tree line bounding the left of their line.
As noted, the weather had been wet and the battle field was a sea of mud. This hindered the French, but the first rank attacked and pressed the English. The English bowmen stopped shooting and came to the aid of the men at arms. The French second rank also attacked and faced heavy casualties. The French fought without good organization or clear leadership, their problem in earlier battles. They were unable to capitalize on their superiority in numbers. The also suffered because as they advanced their line was compressed from the original length of 1200 yards to the actual frontage between the armies of only 950 yards. This meant that the French were getting in each other´s way and were unable to adequately maneuver against the English. Burne also argues that the French were more focussed on the men at arms than on the archers and ignored the attack of the archers, to their disadvantage. These 15th century miniatures show representations of the battle. The first is from a French manuscript in the V& in London, the second is from the Chronique de St.-Alban. Both are in Bacquet´s Azincourt.

The English were so pressed that Henry ordered his prisoners slaughtered, something very much against the tenets of chivalry. Some were burned alive in a hut where they were being held captive. The miniature below shows French prisoners being led off the field. Note the fleur de lis on their vests over their armour.

The third rank of French, looking out over their slaughtered colleagues, did not advance. In the several hours of battle the smaller English army defeated a much larger French force, killing 10000 Frenchmen. ( Burne argues the issue was decided within the first 30 minutes.) This was to be the last of the great English set piece victories. While the English tide was still rising, the French were to do better a generation later.
The battle was disastrous to the French. Once again, a significant piece of the nobility was lost, including several people who had coinage in their own right. Antoine of Bourgogne, duc of Brabant was one of these people.

5°) English archers

The history of this vignette starts at a hospital in Madrid in a hot August. In those places the time goes slow and in an only evening, thanks to the reading, I got to come back almost 600 years in a travel to the end of the Middle Ages, around the outumn of the year 1415.
I´m not a special enthusiast of this period ( I´m convinced is due to my aknowledgment of it, the same happened to me with other periods) but if a child lying on a hospital bed asks you to paint those archers that he is seeing in a plate of a book, I assure you it´s very difficult to refuse to it.
Therefore, the first I did was to look for an archers and I found them in a wonderful vignette from the firm Soldiers, settled down in the battle og Agincourt.
Many times I have seen medieval vignettes and figures which their little plaque precisely located them at Agincourt and as I knew nothing about it, I practically started from nothing regarding to the documentation.
In the North of France, near Calais, where the strip of sea separating France from England is more narrow, it´s the little village of Agincourt or Azincourt which gave name to this famous battle that was on October, the 24th, 1415 amongst the english troops commanded by the king Henry V and the french troops under Charles VI, a king whose life was always just before madness and illness.
The origin of this battle lies in the english king Henry V´s aspirations of recovering the Duchy of Normandy that had been in english hands more than two hundred years ago. With this purpose, English had carried out a serie of incursions on french territory, making sacking, collecting plunders and undermining the french kings´ authority. Neverthless is in this year, when the english army tries to make a serious offensive to get its objectives thanks to the superiority of its weapons, specially the fearsome archers; and they wanted to make the most of the fact that the internal disputes of the french nobility near of a civil war.
This battle is probably epic and famous because of the great diference of the number of combatants between both sides, being clearly higher the french army ( Besides, the english army was devastated by the illness, starvation or simply, to be on enemy ground), which in the end, was defeated.
The chronicals tell about the decisive role of the english archers who thanks to their perfect use of their bows first, and then to their " agility" wielding their weapons ( swords, axes, maces, . ..) fighting on a covered with mud terrain front to a knights with a very heavy weapons, stuffed into their armours and completelly exhausted, turned out to be the decisive force in that battle.

The vignette
The figures which composed this vignette are made of white metal and their scale is 54 mm. They are modelled by the italian Mario Venturi and are part of the catalogue from the commercial firm Soldiers with the following reference: SD5 " The Longbows" in its serie " Dioramas".
The kit is made up of the two figures, the defences, several loose arrows and some tools characteristic of the preparation of these defences, in addition of a small pedestal. Also, as documentation, a small historical text, a general references of colours and a graphics relating to the bows appear.
One of the things I liked the best in the vignette is the balancing that emanates from the postures of the figures, since both ones are in motion, this is not exaggerated. Likewise the general modelling is good enough and this helps a lot to paint it. The work of preparing the kit and glueing its pieces is neither complicated, and this for a clumsy like me is for being infinitely grateful; besides, the whole pieces have a bolt to secure their fitting-in. For the beginners in this hobby I´d like to emphasize the importance of this, as many times we are not into this and the surprises come later!.
As regards to the painting I don´t think I had a lot of to contribute because of my level isn´t enough to begin with researches and mixtures of different colours. I take from here and there and as the proportions are never the same, I trust this to get personal shades. However and in case it could help somebody, I present next a charts of the colours used on the most significative parts of both figures.

ARCHER JOHN SMITH

FLESH
Base: Orange Brown + Flat Yellow + Burnt Sienna + Vermellion
Highlights: Base + Golden Flesh. In the las highlights I added White.
Shades: Base + Flat Brown
LEATHER JACKET
Base: Flat Brown + Ochre Brown
Highlights: Base + Ochre Brown. The last + Orange
Shades: Base + Flat Brown.
TUNIC
Base: Deck Tan + A bit of English Uniform
Highlights: Base + Silvered Grey
Shades: Base + English Uniform

ARCHER WALTER SWIFT

FLESH
Base: Orange Brown + Light Brown + Flat Yellow + Magenta and Intense Blue ( a bit of these two latest)
Highlights: Base + Matt Flesh
Shades: Base + Flat Brown. The last + Violet
LONG JACKET
Base: Prussian Blue ( Andrea Color) + Violet + Green Blue + Black
Highlights: 1st Base + Intense Blue - 2nd + Green Blue - Last: + Matt Flesh
Shades: Base + Prussian Blue + Black
TROUSERS
Base: Green Blue + Pastel Green + Flesh + Black
Highlights: Base + Green Blue + Matt Flesh
Shades: Base + Black
ARCOS
They have a base of Wood ( Andrea Color) using for the highlights Chalk Ochre utilizando para las luces el Ocre Tiza y para las sombras el Negro. I made them as velatures insisting and insisting time and again.
HELMET
Both are painted with metalic lacquer from Gunze Sangyo following the instructions that Augie does in his article " White armours in campaign".
BELTS
They are painted in several brown hues and then I applied water brushstrokes ( yes) in order to get a satin finish.
The strings of the bows were supplied with the kit, they are made of cotton thread and they were dyed with a yellow brown.

Before finishing, I´d like to comment and to recommend a habit I have. It´s to read any sort of historic novel set in the age or/and the situation in what the action took place. Specifically for this vignette I still have on my night table one of the stories of this topic with which I have recently enjoyed more and that´s the reason for what I´d like to to share it with everybody. Its title is " El Bosque de la larga espera" ( The long wait wood) by Hella S. HAASSE. It´s the story of the king Charles of Orleans and the fights among the knights of the different nobiliary houses in France at the beginnig of the 15th century ( Borgoña, Orleans, Armañac, . ..), all set in the war of the Hundred Years and told in a very entertaining way.

T'avais eu combien a ton TPE?

Mdr, mythique ce topic.

J'avoue

demande de fruit pour nécropost.

mdr brendan

j'avais eu 13