http://www.gamespot.com/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=24311242&page=1
ce post sur gamespot le sugere !
Just wait till E3! All will be revealed. But this article seems to smell from the word go.
First, it is from a not so well known site.
Second, no other more well known sites have been privy to this info.
Third, if you really read into the site you will see that they contradict everything they said. Sentence two contradicts sentence one and three contradicts two, it is almost that bad. One of my favorites was how they state that PS3 is only ever so slightly more powerful than the 360, but then they claim that the games they are watching look better than most 360 games and that the launch games will look just as good as games like gears of war. However, the games they were watching are still very early in development, so if they already look like the same quality of gears of war, then wouldn´t you think that when they are finished they will look substantially better.
They also mentioned that graphically both systems are almost the same, but it is just the PS3 can handle more physics and draw more things on the screen than the 360. Well if the PS3 can draw more things at once, would that not in fact mean that the graphics should be better? If a persons face has 10 million polygons on the 360 and 15 million on the PS3 would not the PS3 graphics look better (and I just made those numbers up to make the point of being able to draw more on the screen at one time)?
Conclusion: Bogus! Either that or the authors are complete idiots and do not know how to write. Good writers don´t contradict themselves every other sentence.