"This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 217.18.23.2 (Talk) at 15:12, 25 April 2007. It may differ significantly from the current revision.

C´est une ancienne revision de la page, comme éditer par ..... ect.. ect.... Elle peut etre significativement différente de la version courante !
"
merci je sais lire l´anglais

1. kaliweb profil
2. Posté le 04 septembre 2007 à 18:14:39 avertir modérateur
3. la difference de police sur le screen vient du fait que wiki affiche en gras et en rouge les modifs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w[...]amp;oldid=125851329

ok, mais sur le screen de halo.FR

c´était pas marqué, pouvait pas savoir moi que c´était en gras

et je me disais que c´était peut etre à cause du rouge mais la différence ne pouvait pas etre si importante... enfait si

c´est honteux, masi evidement comme c´est Sony, vous touvez ca nrmal

ca vous derange pas de cautionner ce genre de praique,

Sony pourrit le marché du jeux video depuis des années

jamais dit que c´est normal, c´est honteux...

Pour élargir le débat:
Voici un listing (pê pas complet) de tous ceux qui ont modifié Wikipédia à leur bénéfice:

--------------------------------------------------
--------

Among many revelations, Wikipedia Scanner reported that:

- Microsoft tried to cover up the XBOX 360 failure rate

- Apple edit Microsoft entries, adding more negative comments about its rival

- Bill Gates revenge? Microsoft edits Apple entries, adding more negative comments about its rival

- The Vatican edits Irish Catholic politician Gerry Adams page

- In the 9/11 Wikipedia article, the NRA added that “Iraq was involved in 9/11”

- Exxon Mobil edits spillages and eco-system destruction from oil spillages article

- FBI edits Guantanamo Bay, removing numerous pictures

- Oil company ChevronTexaco removes informative biodiesel article and deletes a paragraph regarding fines against the company

- Scientology removes criticism and negatives article from Scientology page

- Al Jazeera TV station adds that the foundation of Iraq was just as bad as the Holocaust

- Amnesty International removes negative comments

- Dell Computers deletes negative comments on customer services and removes a passage how the company outsources work to third world countries

- MySpace removes paragraph when their website was hacked

- EA Games deletes whole paragraphs of criticism about employment practices and business methods

- Dog breeding association deletes whole paragraphs about fatal attacks by dogs on humans

- US Republican Party changes the "Post-Saddam" section of the Baath Party article to a different account of the war, changing the language from "US-led occupation" to "US-led liberation"

- Fox News removes all controversial topics against the network from the Fox News page

- News of the World deletes a number of criticism against the paper

- Nestle removes negative comments on its business practices from its page

- UN address calls journalist Oriana Fallaci a racist ‘prostitute’

- Portuguese government removes entries about Prime Minister’s scandals

- DieBold, the company that controversially supplied computerised polling stations in the US elections, removes numerous paragraphs with negative comments

- Walmart removes criticism of outsourcing work. The retailer also changes negative paragraphs of underpaid workforce

- Sony removes harmful paragraphs against blu-ray systems

- Someone at Reuters calls Bush “a mass murderer”

- Coca Cola removes negative content about its effects

- British Conservative Party removes negative references of its MPs and deletes paragraph of the party’s old policies

- US University adds the “prestigious” adjective to its page

- Boeing edits from “Boeing is a leading American aircraft and aerospace manufacturer” to “Boeing is the leading American aircraft and aerospace manufacturer”

- MSN Search is “a major competitor to Google”. That’s what MSN added to their page

- BBC changes Blair´s drink from coffee to vodka and his workout from the gym to the bedroom. Someone from the BBC also changes Bush’s page, changing the name from ”George Walker Bush” to “George Wan*** Bush”

- Someone from The Guardian edits the Wikipedia page of rival newspaper The Times. Originally in the article it is said that The Times sells more than The Guardian. After the edit, The Guardian sells more.

ca entre dans quelle catégorie ce genre de pratique? marketting viral?

Someone from the BBC also changes Bush’s page, changing the name from ”George Walker Bush” to “George Wan*** Bush” AHAH pas mal

Wanker = branleur pour les non-anglophones.

sa sent le gros FAKE ce truc comme ci Sony avait que ça a foutre, un article juste pour relancer la gueguerre des boutenneux sur la mayeur konsol nekste Gen

la guerre c´est la guerre tous les moyens sont mis en oeuvre, meme les plus deloyal

D´un autre coté cette phrase n´est pas fause, car halo 3 est un loin dêtre une claque graphique !

Mieux vaut la main dans le sac, que le doigt dans le cul

Mort de rire, on sent bien que Sony a peur là

Si c´était une daube bande de dégouttés, pourquoi auraient t´ils peur ??

25 April ?

http://xbcmania.free.fr/img-trucagesony.png

c´est quoi que tu comprends pas? april ou 25?

Juste que ce soit annoncé aussi tard, c´est bizzare pour une page ou énormément de monde passe .