Je me fais pitié quand je me relis sur Reddit en répondant aux athées, c'est vraiment ouf quoi.
Genre :
<< 1° A believe isn't about the validity of a statement. A positive believe can't be compare to a true statement. Believe is about the intensity of the believe and not about the Truth (that is in your mind adequacy between the statement and the world).
Ok, I don't believe in an giant tea cup beyond Saturn. But that's not all. I have to explain why "I Believe there is no giant tea cup..." Because : I believe only what i'm seeing. Or Giant space tea cup is a superfluous hypothethis. But why superfluous ? Because It's does'nt help me to predict anything or to act on anything etc..
That's what i'm saying, you can't just "not believe", you have to produce some reasons or presupposition to not believe in something.
2° God can be an hypothesis, you just have to take a look at the Ethology. Mecanism isn't enough to explain the animal's behavior. I recommend you to read the first book of the founder of Ethology : Jakob von Uexküll, A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans. with A Theory of Meaning. Especillay in "A Theory of Meaning", the chapter IV about the interpretation of web's spider. I mean "God" but it could be Nature or Order or Animal's purposes or Adequancy etc..Extra-pysical (or chemical) principle.
3° The ability of predict something like an event isn't the explanation of this event. Predict is the final purpose of the modern Science and Science want we to believe that purpose will be the total explanation for the predicted thing. On the sideway, there is another method to use Science, it's called "morphogenesis theories" and it emphasizes on the world's comprehensibility and not only Science's efficiency.
Atheism is a doctrine because Atheism is based on the believe of Science, the believe of "predict is explain", the believe of the powerful effiancy, the belief of "I Believe on what i'm seeing" etc.. >>
Je m'exècre.